Taking the Bear by the Horns!

Obama Team Moves to Regulate Complex Financial Instruments
by Kevin G. Hall - McClatchy TruthOut

Reform Movement:
Rachel Maddow at commondreams.org
Philip Zelikow on His Testimony tortured memos
www.TomPaine.com
The Progressive
OurFuture.org
Center for American Progress
Think Progress
The Huffington Post
The Pelosi Brief
The Noble Stunt Meme*
and The Ticking Time Bomb Scenario.
Blame the counsel, the comedian and the computer.

* Sen. Linsey Graham[update] (Bush Administration saw law as "nicety we could not afford")
"there is a purpose for everything, there is a reason people do what they do...hierarchy of needs..."(14:50-15:24)
the levin report(15:30)
Brian Beutler TPMMuckraker
Jane Mayer The New Yorker
"the moral high ground in this war is the high ground, it is not a location..."(15:40)
common article 3?(16:35-17:00)
the Geneva Convention did not apply? an argument
"what we do in looking back, may determine how we move forward..." (17:30-19:00)
(all times for Noble Stunt Meme[video])
[The Golden Rule(in Progress) is no joke. Nor are the fine points of law or politics just stunts.]

Up Date

Not to pun on Treks and Wars. **

3 Noble, No Bell, Nobel
4 (b) Culture War
1 (a, b, C c, D d)
2 (A a, b)

Yes, I know there's a* difference.
* anachronism
** or loose dots [!]

[Related Freed Men ? ]
FC transition to Find Charts.
Somewhere there is bank*** for a buck.

*** (a, b)

 [8-1 & bolds added] [FP1]

FOOTNOTES PAGE TWO AUGUST 2013

8-1-13:"up date"(sc)(b.s.)(1)Connecting the Dots(sc), Culture War (2)(a), Way, Too Point Oh?(sc), Noble, No Bell, Nobel(sc), Congress- - to boldly go..., Everything is on the Table!.

8-5-13:  (b.s.) a.Pun it?, b.Trilemmas and Cultural Calculus, c.Enough Smirking!, d.Dark Matter, Anti-Matter, e. Careful Consideration , f. , g. , h. Con Fluence... , i.Knot Even , j., k.Carpe Diem!, l.Certain Sources..., m. , N .by Stiob?!?, o., P.Middle C? , Q. / [T-Row Price?]

8-9-13 (37) "dealing with" (MSNBC "All IN" & Thomas Roberts) (P.S. re:Bromance)

8-20-13 Boatload of FP needed.  4. a C Sick? , b , c , d , e , f , G , h , i Square This!  j , k , 5. a, b, c by Stiob?!? - 6. a, b() Nailed It! T-point Oh! , c CU T-party, d , e , f, g , h Square This! , ... q Tea Party Down Grade

8-21-13 Miranda Lefts? 1. a. b. c. d.  /   2.  A. b. c. d. e. f. g. h. i. j.
8-22-13: FC /  changey thing to reads.
8-26-13 Lemon Ship may be the best name for the dynamic metaphor as I sort out how it has evolved.  Does it stem from partisan ship?  But it does refer to concentrates and dilutions.
8-27-13 Knot so Out of the Blue? 
8-28-13: A Black and White Chat, that is the ticket.(FP3)

Noble, No Bell, Nobel

It was no dynomite for some, nor Hopenhagen.

[Comment above posting on 12-14-09..Originally held in draft 12-11-09 continue as AMENDED here:
Obama's Nobel Lecture; MSNBC, Part I, Part II, Part III, Part IV, Jon Stewart , If Only[**]. ]

[Rounding it out: Obama Doctrine*, If Only, Great Debates, Values: to boldly go wagering "hard work" ]
[EarlierWest PointSpeech: just in case]

* "If Only" this link were followed by...(ribble?)following the Obama Doctrine and wagering Peace. "If Only" duplicity hints at Asterisk Trek, or the star power of words. Do not confuse the just with the jest.

[For future and path, consideration.]

[See 1st comment: PEACE! Get 'er done! Not pieces, get err done. On the other hand...]

[** 12-15-09 UPDATE: Arianna Huffington aggrees with Sarah Palin? Only in Con Text which is out of context, meaning what opinion makers so easily do by selecting their snippets. Neither Palin nor Bush would have been able give this speech and put war in context, but taking it out of context, there could be no difference.]

The Thorn and the Lyin'

Androcles or Ambrose?
But no Saint Donald*.
Trump claims** noble agenda.

Next? The President's Academic Records or Ayn Rand's.



*or J'Rome via Vulgate

** media and mess age(under wave)

[Back Log]
[And not too unribble ...hmmm.]
[By Jingo, QED? Or Here?]

Knot 2B3

Footnotes Page Three
1-14-14 Spoiler Alert ? I have yet to read the "?" mark but it is only a locator link and NOW I could use a Ford...as the online is numbered 99 but the hardcopy I hold is #98, yet here is the point. (Owe Hegel: I thought I had the next iss[u]e.*)  But I found more, which I have inserted in no particular order {!}. {exceptions to the line} {!}some require subscription.  I must manually transcribe the leaps after I have fully read it. Such as "Hermeneutics", "German" and "Dutch"(therapy) of the "marketplace" ironically unable to Ctrl F(it) ! **

 *an anacronism @ Barnes and Noble. [u] edited*
** (scroll click back)! The_Death_of_Pythagoras, Consuming_And_Producing_Culture, An_Argument_About_Free_Will, Minds_and_Computers_An_Introduction_to_AI_by_Matt_Carter, Angst_and_Affirmation_in_Modern_Culture, &*** (?)[!] Nietzsche_Our_Contemporary : (a,b,c)d / e ? ^

*** 7th The_Death_of_Postmodernism And_Beyond, (Colin_Wilson_As_Hydra), [The_Varieties_of_Atheist_Experience] :
^ (athrue / ?)

[Isn't everyone an Existentialist or a Post-Modern^^, unless(de#) they aRe Manichean ?]

^^ ? Rorty / Popper ~ Hegel / MarX[?]
[I have yet to adjust the labels at 1-14-14 but will insert these possible loose threads or just lost, but after I found ^^  a duelity which I may have sublimated, but will not likely take away my re-assemblage from scratch so to speak, could I Twryality ?(Not without W)

Back-Log August 20th, Political is the Process

(Letter send to local paper, not printed.)
Bush Agenda Needs More Attention, Not Sympathy

Your view that Cindy’s Sheehan’s grief fuels the anti-Bush agenda is not as controversial as the assessment that her name stands out due to "media attention" is obvious. Both of those are just the way things work. Less obvious probably is the media’s responsibility and congress is not far behind in blame. What is missing in your piece is the reason she is there now. That is that the president is using the deaths of our service men and women in Iraq for political purposes and linking them to a "noble cause".

If the media and congress would hold the president accountable for more than slogans we would likely not be in Iraq let alone be uncomfortable with his inability to face us or plan for success. Imagine that someone would use their grief to change things and imagine further that she gets support from sympathizers that are political as well as qualified. The supporters of the administration and our "struggle" could only hope for as much.

Intelligent Design? More Irony.

Going back two posts to the reality of cause and effect that seems to be denied by Bush, it should be obvious that Cindy Sheehan's important question(What is the noble cause?)is normally addressed preemptively in order for there to be any success in a project. Just how can anyone expect to reach a goal that is shifting and undefined, not to mention prepared for properly without all the input available.

Support for our troops and support for our president must remain separate issues, or they cannot be fighting for our freedoms, let alone democracy. Success in Iraq cannot come from a leader who cannot face the issues honestly and uses the troops as the latest justification. Success or withdrawal from Iraq cannot be done without the honest intention to actually leave and a plan to do it.

Is this a political agenda? Thank God that that is what America is about, politics rather than many alternatives. Denial that it is, is the political agenda of those that would just take power and decide later and alone how they can succeed.

Opposition to war does not mean opposition to success, just to the method of operation that is not so apparent.

Denial of the physics or philosophy of cause and effect will not be the way to succeed. Realizing that others operate under the same laws of nature will explain why force is met with force. Words may not always be important but connecting them to actions and realizing they get reactions whether they are understood or not, would go a long way toward success if we can work together to define it.

UN-REALITY AND CAMP CASEY

I must read more(On the WP "unreality" and on Camp Casey messaging), but it seems that the qualifiers or the choice of words still leave a lot of wiggle room (in the WP piece) when it comes to knowing what they really mean or when they intended it. My "pre-"cursory analysis is that we should now focus on what the noble cause "was" as it will always depend on what the definition of "is" is. Now seemingly "post-war on terror" and with the on going "struggle" a look back at what the reasons were may lay in "following the money" and not only holding the administration and its "willing" corporate sponsors(profiteers) accountable but congress and the media as Cindy Sheehan has noted many times.

Having not finished reading the following, they may deserve some credit for this line of thought:
CINDY'S MESSAGE:
HOWARD DEAN'S:
IRAN NEXT?: (Why we need to remember the unreality!)

Jumping to the conclusion(with a re-read needed), in other words did we really intend to win something that was going to be ongoing and unconnected? The next project(U.N or Iran] will be a different matter but what will have changed?
[Sorry needed to rant or question/hit and run.]
But...If I may project further, that others may take more responsibility.

[NOTE: as I post this I have now read the below link.]